Most countries have their own performing rights organisation, and while reciprocal agreements between PROs mean you do not always need to join every one, there are significant gaps in those agreements that cause royalties to go uncollected for independent artists with international audiences.
What is a PRO and why are there so many?
A Performing Rights Organisation (PRO) is a collecting society that licenses the public performance and broadcasting of musical compositions and distributes the resulting royalties to songwriters and publishers. Every country or region with a developed music industry has at least one PRO — PRS for Music in the UK, ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC in the US, SOCAN in Canada, APRA AMCOS in Australia and New Zealand, GEMA in Germany, SACEM in France, and so on. PROs are, in most countries, the mandatory licensing mechanism: broadcasters and streaming platforms cannot legally perform compositions in that territory without a licence from the relevant PRO, regardless of where the songwriter is based. This territorial structure means that your royalties from international activity are handled by the PRO in each territory where your music is used.
Which PROs matter for UK independent artists?
As a UK-based songwriter, your primary membership is with PRS for Music. PRS has reciprocal agreements with dozens of international PROs, which means that when your music generates royalties in Germany, France, or Japan, the local PRO collects on your behalf and forwards the payment to PRS, which then distributes it to you. For most territories, the reciprocal system works adequately. However, there are specific situations where direct registration with an overseas PRO produces better results than relying on the reciprocal system:
- United States — the US has three PROs (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC) and a blanket licence system that does not map cleanly onto PRS's reciprocal agreements. For consistent collection of US performance royalties, some UK songwriters choose to also affiliate with a US PRO, particularly for writers with significant US broadcast or live performance exposure.
- Canada — SOCAN has a reasonable reciprocal relationship with PRS, but processing delays and matching difficulties for independent works are more common here than in Europe.
- Australia — APRA AMCOS collects efficiently for PRS members under the reciprocal arrangement, but works must be correctly registered with sufficient detail (ISWC, full co-writer information) to match correctly in the APRA system.
- Markets without strong reciprocal relationships — some Middle Eastern, African, and Southeast Asian territories have limited or no reciprocal agreements with PRS. Income from these territories may require direct engagement or a publisher with local relationships.
How reciprocal agreements work (and when they fail)
Under a reciprocal agreement, two PROs agree to collect on each other's behalf in their respective territories. When a UK-registered work generates income in Australia, APRA AMCOS collects the royalty, deducts an administration fee, and forwards the remainder to PRS, which applies its own deduction and distributes to the writer. This system works when the works are well-registered on both ends. When it fails, it typically fails because the work registration at PRS does not contain enough information for the overseas PRO to match it against a usage report — specifically, because the ISWC is missing, the title variant differs, or the co-writer information is incomplete. The overseas PRO cannot match the usage to a known work, and the royalty sits unmatched.
Step-by-step: registering with PRS and PPL as a UK base
For a UK independent artist, the correct base setup is membership with both PRS (for compositions) and PPL (for recordings). PRS collects performance and mechanical royalties for the composition. PPL collects neighbouring rights royalties for the recording — separate income from the same events. Join PRS at prsformusic.com and register each work with full songwriter credits, co-writer splits, and the ISWC. Join PPL at ppluk.com as both a performer and a rights holder if you perform on your own recordings and own your own masters. Register your recordings with PPL using their online portal, including the ISRC for each recording. Once both registrations are in place, PRS and PPL share data through their joint CatCo matching system, which links recording usage to composition rights and distributes correctly.
When to register directly abroad vs. rely on reciprocal deals
Direct registration with an overseas PRO makes sense when: you have a demonstrably significant audience in that territory (measurable via streaming analytics); you have had consistent problems receiving payments from that territory under the reciprocal arrangement; you are actively touring or promoting in that market; or you are releasing through a local label or publisher with existing PRO relationships there. For most independent UK artists with modestly international but not territory-specific audiences, the PRS reciprocal system is sufficient, provided all works are correctly registered at PRS with complete metadata. The cost-benefit of direct overseas registration only tips in favour of direct registration when there is a specific, identified income stream that the reciprocal system is failing to deliver.
Managing multiple registrations without conflicts
The primary risk of registering with multiple PROs is creating duplicate collection claims or split conflicts. If you register a work with both PRS and a US PRO, the two societies may both attempt to collect for US performances, leading to double payment or payment suspension pending dispute resolution. Most PROs have rules preventing double membership for the same rights — you typically designate one PRO as your 'home society' for each territory. Working with a publishing administrator who understands the international PRO landscape is the most reliable way to manage multi-territory registrations without creating conflicts.
Code Group Music's Publishing Administration service manages PRO registrations across multiple territories on your behalf, ensuring correct metadata, avoiding dual-collection conflicts, and monitoring distributions for gaps. A free Catalog Assessment identifies which of your works are missing international registrations and where uncollected royalties are most likely to exist. Start at codegroupmusic.co.uk/#catalog-assessment.
Published